Question DetailsNormal
$ 20.00
GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Discussion Board 2
- From Law, General Law
Question posted by
- Mimicmore
- Rating : 0
- Grade : No Rating
- Questions : 0
- Solutions : 31
- Blog : 0
- Earned : $108.50
State the general purpose for the Model Rules contained in the reading and study materials. Then analyze the specific rules governing “Meritorious Claims and Contentions,” “Expediting Litigation,” and “Candor toward the Tribunal.” Include the purpose for each rule, specific examples of when the rules are violated, and the biblical principles that coincide with the prohibitions that are contained in the rules.
Available Answer
$ 20.00
[Solved] GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Discussion Board 2
- This Solution has been Purchased 2 time
- Submitted On 25 Jan, 2020 10:40:16
Answer posted by
- Mimicmore
- Rating : 0
- Grade : No Rating
- Questions : 0
- Solutions : 31
- Blog : 0
- Earned : $108.50
In this day in age, our legal system is ever changing towards the social and technological advances we observe every day. To ensure legal representation continues to uphold the highest of standards, these model rules contained in the reading and study materials must be emphasized regularly throughout the legal system. All model rules must be interpreted with the correct amount of research and references to ensure the proper representation of the law itself. Overall, these rules “define proper conduct for the purposes of professional discipline” throughout our entire legal system. [1]
Correspondingly, the rules governing meritorious claims, and contentions, as well as expediting litigation and candor towards the tribunal are precise in their respective categories. Meritorious claims and contention specifically deal with the concept that a lawyer should never intervene or defend a proceeding unless there are grounds and legality towards doing so. [2] Furthermore, the lawyer must act upon defending the proceedings frivolously and doing so with out of good faith. [3] For example: a lawyer could choose to take a civil rights case if he/she observes constitutional sovereign liberties being vi...
Other Similar Questions
termp...
Legal Ethics.ResearchPaper.docx GOVT 325 The Mandate of Above Reproach: The Obligation o
Legal Ethics.ResearchPaper.docx GOVT 325 The Mandate of Above Reproach: The Obligation of Professionalism Helms School of Government, Liberty University GOVT 325-B02 Legal Ethics The Mandate of Above Reproach: The Obliga...
mimic...
GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Exam 3
Question 1
25 out of 25 points
Explain in your own words the purpose for Rule 7.6 and give an example of the specific type of conduct that is prohibited by the rule.
Selected Answer:
The purpose of Model Rule 7.6 is ...
mimic...
GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Exam 2
Question 1
25 out of 25 points
Rule 4.3, in part, declaims “The lawyer shall not give legal advice to an unrepresented person, other than the advice to secure counsel, if the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that ...
mimic...
GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Test 1
Question 1
20 out of 25 points
According to Rule 2.3 (B) reads, “When the lawyer knows or reasonably should know that the evaluation is likely to affect the client's interests materially and adversely, the lawyer shall ...
mimic...
GOVT 325 LEGAL ETHICS Discussion Board 3
Lawyers at times, may find themselves in positions where they are a part of a law firm or association. Furthermore, a lawyer may be delegated authority when supervising other attorneys within the firm. The supervisory role ...