Group discussion week4.docx Quality Project References Maryville University Notes for

Group discussion week4.docx    Quality Project References  Maryville University  Notes for week 4 : We began on March 29 by the start of the conversation from Kim about setting up the document. Then from there (I) Renee posed the question of how many articles per person should be considered. Kim then stated that she felt like that would be a good number for the articles and should we look at specific sources as well. From there we have looked at collecting articles on different types of bloodstream infections and settled on sepsis and CLABSI as our focus bloodstream infections. After some discussion we have decided to go ahead and split the final paper into four parts and each member taking a section. Kim and Jess have parts one and two and Traci and I have parts three and four. Great communication skills have facilitated the division of work between all members, fundamentally we want the group to excel. We have continued to communicate between the members of the group and have collected the necessary resources that we need for the work to be done in the final paper and presentation. We have completed this weeks work and are currently discussing week 5 Process Map, which Kim started on Saturday.  Bibliography  Dat, V.Q., Vu, H.N., The, H.N., Nguyen, H.T., Hoang, LB., Viet, D.,...Wertheim, H. (2017).  Bacterial bloodstream infections in a tertiary infectious diseases hospital in Northern Vietnam: Aetiology, drug resistance, and treatment outcome. BMC Infectious Diseases, 1, 1. https//:doi.org/10.1186/s128