University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet

University of Phoenix Material BUGusa, Inc., Worksheet Use the scenarios in the BUGusa, Inc., link located on the student website to answer the following questions. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc., Advertisement Has WIRETIME, Inc., committed any torts? If so, explain. Wiretime, Inc. Advertisement committed defamation under the intentional business-related torts laws. They Wiretime could actually fall under two types of defamation. The first type of defamation is Dissemination to a third party. When Wiretime placed their add stating that BUGusa, Inc. was low quality and did not work reliably for more than a month, they opened the door to reach the ears of a third party which is anyone who reads that magazine. The second type of defamation would be Specificity due to the false statements made about their products, if indeed the statements are false and can be proven to be false they can sue. Scenario: WIRETIME, Inc. (Janet) Has WIRETIME, Inc. committed any torts? If so, explain. As in the case of Computer Researchers Inc., (CRI) in Melvin 2011, Wiretime, under the Business competition torts has committed the Tortious Interference with Existing Contractual Relationship which means BUGusa Inc. has recourse against Wiretime Inc. BUGusa will now have to spend thousands of dollars training someone to take...

Buy now to view the complete solution