Project manager improve the accuracy of the results
- From Business, General Business
- Tutor-571
- Rating : 51
- Grade : A+
- Questions : 1
- Solutions : 5085
- Blog : 0
- Earned : $6352.87
Page:of 8
Automatic Zoom Actual Size Page Fit Page Width 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 200% 300% 400%
Analyzing Risks (graded)
Risk analysis is a critical step in the overall process of risk management. How does a
project manager improve the accuracy of the results when analyzing risks?
How does a project manager gain consensus when analyzing risks?
In project management, risk identification begins at the earliest stages of a project and
continues throughout the project life cycle. Project risks can include unknown issues and
variability in cost, effort, timing, and benefits in relation to a specific project. As a project
manager, it is your job to anticipate project risks and to implement the necessary controls
before risks become insurmountable. Project managers typically classify risks as either
threats or opportunities. The practice of risk identification focuses on reducing the probability
and impact of a threat while increasing the probability and impact of an opportunity. During
the risk identification phase, a project manager must establish the various risk categories that
are pertinent to the project before selecting the appropriate tools and techniques to identify
risks.
In project management, risk identification begins at the earliest stages of a project and continues
throughout the project life cycle. Project risks can include unknown issues and variability in cost,
effort, timing, and benefits in relation to a specific project. As a project manager, it is your job to
anticipate project risks and to implement the necessary controls before risks become
insurmountable. Project managers typically classify risks as either threats or opportunities. The
practice of risk identification focuses on reducing the probability and impact of a threat while
increasing the probability and impact of an opportunity. During the risk identification phase, a
project manager must establish the various risk categories that are pertinent to the project before
selecting the appropriate tools and techniques to identify risks.When each risk item is categorized in
proper classification, have the probability of occurrence, severity and impact correctly identified and
then it is easy to come out with the risk score and likely impact of the risk on the project.
Project manager can gain consensus when analyzing risks by carrying out objective and
quantitative assessment of all risk items. When each risk item is categorized in proper
classification, have the probability of occurrence, severity and impact correctly identified and
then it is easy to come out with the risk score and likely impact of the risk on the project. This
way, the project manager can easily get consensus from the team members on the risk
analysis. Analyzing the risks involves assessing the likelihood of the risk occurring and the
impact on project's objectives. The likelihood and impact can be quantified as appropriate
based on risk criteria. There are tools and techniques for analyzing and prioritizing risks e.g.
risk mapping, workshops, surveys etc which can also help build consensus within the team.
Consensus is a procedure that every team member agrees with a final decision of a project,
this process involves evaluation, examining, and combining ideas by each member.
Consensus requires team work to achieve the best final solution, this practice also motivates
every team member to trust each other and to confront the consequences either are wrong or
correct. To achieve a project manager should obtain trust of the team by taking in
consideration all the ideas of the each member ‘ethics, politics, and values. This process also
needs the ability to tolerate, disagree, agree, and accept possible controversy, the success of
the project will depends on how well the project manager involves the whole team.
Another way for the PM to help ensure consensus is to involve the project team in the
analyzing and assessment of risk categories and threat levels to the project timeline and
resources. By keeping the team involved from the beginning the PM will gain their trust and
also help to spread ownership of the Project which helps bind the team together. By
continually assessing for risk and enacting mitigation techniques the PM and Project Team
will be much more successful in the completion of the project.
Involving the project team builds trust, which is required to have less dysfunction. Another
way to gain consensus is to share the results of risk analysis with all stakeholders to reassure
them that a risk assessment has been completed and their is a plan in place to manage
probable risk. Risks should be documented in a risk register, including risk details, impact,
and plan to address. This living document should be updated as the risk assessing continues.
It's critical that a project manager checks in with all stakeholders in regards to risk analysis.
The client, production team and all participating vendors should be included in the process so
all bases are covered. Once the project manager weighs all concerns, a consensus can be
made. I believe the project manager needs to identify and make a Risk matrix before starting
the project and go through each activity step by step. As murphy's law what can go wrong
will go wrong can't be avoided so a good project manager would have a contingency reserve
set aside for these instances. A project manager first needs to know his audience and then be
able to provide factual and data supported risk analysis in a way that his audience can
understand it. Properly using methods to gather possible points of risk and then proper
classification and measurement of how likely they are to happen can be done at a high level
to keep a group of people all on the same page, but it needs to be supported with the details as
further discussion comes about or risks occur and the group needs to react.
Once risks are documented, the project manager can use the Delphi Technique to gain
consensus on which risks have the highest impact on the project. The Delphi Technique is an
anonymous method to question experts about probable risks within a project. This approach
allows participants to speak freely on the risks without fear of repercussion or offending other
participants in the process and they aren’t deterred by the opinion of other stakeholders. The
feedback is then examined by a third party, organized, and then circulated to the experts. The
comments on the identified risks are distributed to all of the participants allowing them to
comment on the identified risks. Through rounds of discussion, consensus on the risks is
reached.
It is always necessary to gain concensus when analyzing risks? Why or why not?
Consensus helps the team members to act on the risk mitigation plan unanimously and
without any differences of opinion. It also means that team members are all aligned with the
project risks and objectives and can work together to minimize the risk or the impact of the
same.
[Solved] project manager improve the accuracy of the results
- This solution is not purchased yet.
- Submitted On 15 Jul, 2018 12:19:45
- Tutor-571
- Rating : 51
- Grade : A+
- Questions : 1
- Solutions : 5085
- Blog : 0
- Earned : $6352.87