Cash-back offer from May 20th to 25th, 2024: Get a flat 10% cash-back credited to your account for a minimum transaction of $50.Post Your Questions Today!

Question Details Normal
$ 70.00

Comparative Essay

  • From Physics, General Physics
  • Due on 08 May, 2017 12:00:00
  • Asked On 02 May, 2017 04:05:40
  • Due date has already passed, but you can still post solutions.
Question posted by
Online Tutor Profile
request

Choose 1 of the following topics for your Comparative Essay:

1.      Original creation of the earth (nebular hypothesis vs. six-day creation),

2.      Geologic time (billions of years vs. thousands of years),

3.      Dating the rocks of the grand canyon (old earth vs. young earth),

4.      Geologic paradigms (uniformitarianism vs. catastrophism), or

5.      Radiocarbon dating (old-earth vs. young-earth methods/assumptions).

 

Content and Outline

Use the following outline when writing your paper. Each point on the outline below must be a separate section (with the section heading, as indicated) within your paper. 

I.                   Introduction

·         Indicate which topic you chose from the list above.

·         Indicate the purpose of your paper (i.e., to compare old-earth and young-earth viewpoints on your chosen topic).

II.                Old-Earth Secular View

·         What is the old-earth secular viewpoint on your chosen topic?

o   Do not discuss the old-earth creationist viewpoint on your chosen topic. For a description of old-earth creationism, go to http://www.icr.org/article/4535/

III.             Young-Earth View

·         What is the young-earth viewpoint on your chosen topic?

IV.             Comparison of the Viewpoints

·         Comparison is articulating similarities between the 2 viewpoints.

·         Be sure to provide at least 2 similarities (comparisons) between the viewpoints.

V.                Contrast of the Viewpoints

·         Contrast is articulating differences between the 2 viewpoints.

·         Be sure to provide at least 2 differences (contrasts) between the viewpoints.

VI.             Conclusion

·         Provide a summary statement for your paper.

·         Be sure to restate your purpose.

·         Do not introduce new material in your conclusion. 

 

Length

This paper must be 1,000–1,500 words. Do not exceed this word limit. The title page and bibliography page do not count toward this word total.

 

Format

There is no need to include an abstract in your paper.

Sources

Your Comparative Essay must include at least 4 scholarly sources in addition the course textbooks. Of these required sources, 2 must be from an old-earth perspective and 2 from a young-earth perspective. Acceptable sources include journal articles, manuscripts, scholarly textbooks, and/or internet sites from .edu or .gov sources. Avoid internet sites from .com, .net, .org, etc. as the information contained therein is not often peer reviewed. There are exceptions to this rule (e.g., the Institute for Creation Research site is a .org site, but it has been judged a reputable site by those in the young-earth community); however, as a general rule, avoid these sites. In particular, avoid Wikipedia. Study Bibles are also not appropriate for this assignment.

Available Answers
$ 40.00

[Solved] Nebular hypothesis vs. six-day creation

  • This solution is not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 04 May, 2017 11:49:49
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
Original creation of the Earth (nebular hypothesis vs. six-day creation) Old earth theory regarding the creation of Earth is completely different from the theory of young earth. Over 200 year’s original creation of earth belief the nebular hypothesis that come from a blur of gas and dust. The believers of old earth especially astronomer believes that the earth is originated from the collision of the dust particles. These dust particles stuck together after getting molten state and then they form the inner planets. Christians believes in the theory of young earth as they are the strong believer of God. Young-Earth and Christians believes that the earth was created by the God in six days. However there has no relationship between the six day theory of creation and nebular theory. According to believers the nebular hypothesis was about 4.5 billion years ago and they believe that the solar system there are only large clouds of dust and gas this is known as nebula. Six day theory states that about 6,000 years earth was created from molten ball. Old-Earth Secular View: It is harder to define the old age Creationism as compared to young Earth creationism believers as it is hard to accept this whole biblical literalism on one phase as that of empirical reality on other phase. The whole concept is divided into some general classes however there is variations in the thoughts or ideas so it is harder for believers to grab the realism facts. According to day age creationism, people those who are orthodox says that go...
Buy now to view the complete solution
$ 70.00

[Solved] Comparative Essay

  • This Solution has been Purchased 1 time
  • Submitted On 08 May, 2017 08:54:17
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
....The Old-Earth perspective is that Earth was formed through Nebular Hypothesis, whereby the earth ascended from collisions of gas and dust particles that melted as well as stuck together to make bigger blobs of melted rocks to make the inner planets. Also, it is beliefs t...
Buy now to view the complete solution
$ 80.00

[Solved] Geologic Times; Billions of Years vs. Thousands of Years

  • This solution is not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 02 May, 2017 06:02:30
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
Introduction There is no general agreement about the age of the earth. On one hand, there are those who feel that it is billions of years old. On the other hand, there...
Buy now to view the complete solution
$ 70.00

[Solved] radiocarbon dating

  • This solution is not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 03 May, 2017 05:45:55
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
Introduction This paper will take you through the basic information about the radiocarbon dating, the common methods of measurement and varous assumptions related to the radiocarbon dating. Basics of radiocarbon dating The term “radiocarbon” is commonly used to denote 14C, an isotope of carbon which is radioactive with a half-life of about 5730 years. 14C is produced by cosmic rays in the stratosphere and upper troposphere. It is then distributed throughout the rest of the troposphere, the oceans, and Earth’s other exchangeable carbon reservoirs. In the surface atmosphere, about one part per trillion (ppt) of carbon is 14C.All organisms absorb carbon from their environment. Those that absorb their carbon directly or indirectly from the surface atmosphere have about 1ppt of their carbon content as 14C. Such organisms comprise almost all land-dwelling plants and animals. (Other organisms—e.g. fish—have slightly less of their carbon as 14C; this affects how radiocarbon dating works, and there are methods of adjusting for it.) When an organism dies, carbon stops being absorbed. Hence after 5730 years, about half of its 14C will have radioactively decayed (to nitrogen): only about 0.5ppt of the carbon of the organism’s remains will be 14C. And if the carbon of the remains is found to be 0.25ppt 14C, then the organism would be assumed to have died about 11460 years ago. Thus, a simple calculation can find the age, since death, from any 14C concentration. (Remains older than about 50000 years, however, have a 14C concentration that is in practice too small to measure; so they cannot be dated via 14C.) Ages are conventionally reported together with the standard deviation of the laboratory14C measurement, e.g. 900±25 14CBP (14C-dated, years Before Present). This should be doubled to obtain a 95%-confidence interval, e.g. 850– 950 14CBP. (The true range of 95%-confidence, though, will often be larger than this, due to non-laboratory sources of error—e.g. the admixture of impurities with the remains.) Although a tree may live for hundreds, even thousands, of years, each ring of a tree absorbs carbon only during the year in which it grows. The year in which a ring was grown can be determined exactly (by counting); so radiocarbon dating can be tested by measuring the 14C concentrations in old tree rings. Such testing found errors of up to several centuries. It turns out that the concentration of 14C in the carbon of the surface atmosphere has not been a constant 1ppt, but has varied...
Buy now to view the complete solution
$ 70.00

[Solved] Original creation of the earth

  • This solution is not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 03 May, 2017 05:13:40
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
The two theories have very little in common but the debate is extremely heated, with Christians on both sides, as well as atheists and most ...
Buy now to view the complete solution
$ 30.00

[Solved] Original creation of the earth (nebular hypothesis vs. six-day creation)

  • This solution is not purchased yet.
  • Submitted On 05 May, 2017 02:29:05
Answer posted by
Online Tutor Profile
solution
The Big Bang vs Six-Day Creation Introduction The Bible begins with the resounding statement, “In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth” (Gen 1:1 New International Version). Genesis Chapter one walks through each period of creation stating what was done on six days of creation, ending with: “God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning—the sixth day” (Gen 1:1 New International Version). For the purpose of this essay the presuppositions will be that God indeed did create all things, the Bible is the inerrant word of God, and that the Genesis account can be trusted. Yet even after these conclusions are weighed in, still the question must be asked: Did God create the universe in six literal days or was his method of creation the big bang? This question has effectively divided the body of Christ on Earth, with great men and women of faith on both sides of the debate. This biblical description about creation, constitutes the six days creation theory,which Christians believe in.However,atheists and some scientists believe in Nebula cloud theory, which states otherwise. The two theories have very little in common but the debate is extremely heated, with Christians on both sides, as well as atheists and most in the scientific community blasting both young-earth creationism and old earth intelligent design, insisting on an old earth evolutionary view leaving the question of the first cause effectively blank. There are some similarities, many differences, and both six day creation and the big bang have science to back up their views. Young-Earth View There are many great minds on the side of the Old-Earth Big Bang view, but there are also great minds on the side of the Young-Earth six day creation view. Notable young-earth view holders i...
Buy now to view the complete solution
Other Related Questions

The benefits of buying study notes from CourseMerits

Assurance Of Timely Delivery
We value your patience, and to ensure you always receive your homework help within the promised time, our dedicated team of tutors begins their work as soon as the request arrives.
Best Price In The Market
All the services that are available on our page cost only a nominal amount of money. In fact, the prices are lower than the industry standards. You can always expect value for money from us.
Uninterrupted 24/7 Support
Our customer support wing remains online 24x7 to provide you seamless assistance. Also, when you post a query or a request here, you can expect an immediate response from our side.
closebutton
Only 45 characters allowed.
closebutton

$ 629.35