COUN5007 u1d1.docx COUN-5007 In contrasting the articles, what are two differences you o

COUN5007 u1d1.docx  COUN-5007  In contrasting the articles, what are two differences you observed?  The articles by Rosen et al. (2017) and Baker et al. (2017) address methods and strategies for  the treatment of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD); however, their authors™ forms of research and purpose significantly differ. In the case of Rosen et al. (2017), their article is a quantitative empirical study of the œmaintenance and reach of prolonged exposure (PE)  therapy training for  18 months. The purpose is to shed light on the weaknesses associated with trainees not following through with PE in practice, even though a good majority stated  they had the full intention to do so.  Furthermore, Rosen et al. (2017) posited that organizational issues and a lack of resources might also be to blame.  Baker et al. (2017) conducted a systematic qualitative study of existing research that aimed to promote creative arts as an effective therapy for  PTSD. Instead of conducting a hands-on, direct study of a particular treatment, they collected various studies, analyzed each according to the GRADE system, discussed the results, and made future research recommendations. Even though almost all of the studies were ultimately rated poor to very poor, Baker et al. (2017) admit that specific PE therapy data with the creative arts looked promising.  What is your overall impression of the empirical article?  What stood out most was the process they utilized to assess the quality and risk for  bias in the resear